Key Questions in History Taking

The Power of Discriminating Questions

Ask Better — Not More One Question — Two Pathways Strategic Questioning Is Clinical Intelligence
Reminder

Before asking 50 questions —
ask the few that matter most.

The principle A good question changes probability. A great question divides the differential diagnosis into two major groups with a single answer. That is discriminating power.
The approach History taking is not checklist completion. It is strategic questioning — asking the question most likely to narrow the differential at each step in the reasoning process.
The goal To reach diagnosis faster, with fewer questions — by asking better ones. Clinical intelligence is not knowing more questions. It is knowing which question to ask next.
Weak question

Does not narrow thinking

"Any vomiting? Any diarrhoea? Any rash? Any headache? Any travel history?"

Asked randomly, without purpose, in fixed order. Each answer adds noise without directing the differential.

Powerful question

Divides the differential in two

"Was there fever?"

One question. Two completely different clinical pathways. Two different management plans. That is the standard a key question must meet.

Example 01 — Neurology

Child with convulsion — one question, two pathways

Child with Convulsion CTAC first — common presentation KEY QUESTION "Was there fever?" YES NO Convulsion WITH Fever Febrile pathway FEBRILE SEIZURE Age 6mo–5yr Simple vs complex Next: duration, focal? CNS INFECTION Meningitis Encephalitis Next: neck stiffness? Convulsion WITHOUT Fever Afebrile pathway EPILEPSY Known or new Next: prior Hx? EEG, MRI METABOLIC Hypoglycaemia Hyponatraemia Hypocalcaemia STRUCTURAL Space- occupying lesion
One binary question reorganises the entire differential. The left pathway demands immediate assessment for CNS infection. The right pathway demands metabolic screen and neuroimaging. Two completely different clinical plans — determined by a single answer.
What Makes It High-Yield

Five characteristics of a powerful discriminating question

1

Divides Causes

Splits the differential into two major categories. The answer places the patient on one branch — not "somewhere in the middle."

2

Changes Urgency

Yes vs no changes how quickly you must act. The answer determines whether you have minutes, hours, or days.

3

Changes Management

The answer alters what you do next — investigation, treatment, or referral. Questions that do not change management are low-yield at that stage.

4

Localises Pathology

Narrows the anatomical site — upper vs lower airway, central vs peripheral, acute vs chronic. Localisation precedes diagnosis.

5

Has Pathophysiological Meaning

The answer connects to a mechanism. "Was there fever?" connects to infection. "Was onset sudden?" connects to vascular or obstructive causes.

Reference

Dichotomising questions across common presentations

Quick reference — high-yield questions by presentation

Same principle — different presentations

Presentation Key Question If Yes → If No →
Convulsion Was there fever? Febrile pathway — seizure, CNS infection Afebrile — epilepsy, metabolic, structural
Abdominal pain Sudden or gradual onset? Sudden — vascular, perforation, obstruction Gradual — inflammatory, infective, functional
Abdominal pain Colicky or constant? Colicky — hollow viscus, obstruction, renal Constant — peritoneal irritation, solid organ
Headache Sudden severe onset? Thunderclap — subarachnoid until excluded Progressive — raised ICP, tension, migraine
Anaemia Acute drop or chronic symptoms? Acute — haemorrhage, haemolysis Chronic — deficiency, bone marrow, chronic disease
Joint swelling Monoarticular or polyarticular? Mono — septic arthritis, gout, trauma Poly — ARF, JIA, reactive, viral arthritis
Fever Any localising symptoms? Localised — focus-directed investigation None — systematic fever workup
Yield

High-yield vs low-yield — the difference is timing, not relevance

High-Yield Questions

Ask first
Divide the differential into major categories
Change urgency or management based on the answer
Localise pathology anatomically or physiologically
Identify severity or red flags
Have clear pathophysiological meaning
These are the questions to ask first, before narrowing to details.

Low-Yield at That Stage

Wrong timing
Do not change probability at the current stage of reasoning
Collected by habit or format — not because they narrow thinking
Asked before the main categories have been separated
Travel history in a straightforward viral URTI with no indication
Family history before the diagnosis is even narrowed to a system
Important: Low-yield means low-yield at that stage — not irrelevant forever. The same question becomes high-yield later when the differential has narrowed to a point where it applies.
The Process

Clinical thinking sequence — stepwise narrowing

How good clinicians ask

Three steps — repeated within each narrowed group

1

Identify Categories

What are the two or three major pathways for this presentation?

→
2

Select Best Separator

Which single question best splits these categories?

→
3

Ask That Question

Ask it first — before any other question in that group.

→
↺

Repeat Within Narrowed Group

Now the differential is smaller. Apply the same three steps again.

This is stepwise narrowing. Each question reduces the differential. By the third or fourth question, you are often already at a short list of two or three diagnoses — rather than twenty. This is not a shortcut. It is structured clinical intelligence.
The Question Self-Check — Before You Ask

Silently ask yourself — before every history question

If the answer is YES

What will I think? Which pathway does this open? Which diagnoses become more likely? Does urgency change?

If the answer is NO

What will I think? Which pathway does this close? Which diagnoses become less likely? Does management change?

If neither answer changes your thinking — do not prioritise that question at this stage. Move it to later in the history, or to the systematic review, where it belongs. Ask with purpose. Every question should earn its place.
Connected Frameworks

Key questions feed the frameworks from earlier notes

Differential Diagnosis: Good discriminating questions generate the positively and negatively relevant points used to balance the differential. The question is the tool; the balance is the output.
Visit-Revisit: Stepwise narrowing often requires returning to history with new questions as findings emerge. The cascade is iterative — not a single pass.
Summarzing Competency: The pattern named in the summary is shaped by which questions were asked. Better questions produce cleaner patterns — and cleaner summaries.
The Importance of Adjectives: A discriminating question is only as useful as the answer it receives. The answer must be characterised with modifiers — "fever" alone is insufficient; "high-grade continuous fever for 5 days" is what drives the next question.
Common Student Errors

What checklist-based history taking looks like

Memorising long history formats and asking in fixed order regardless of presentation
Asking all questions with equal weight — no prioritisation by discriminating power
Not knowing what a "yes" or "no" answer means before asking
Treating history taking as data collection rather than strategic narrowing
Asking detailed sub-questions before the main categories have been separated
Fearing omission — asking everything, understanding nothing
Final Take-Home Message
"The fastest way to diagnosis is not asking more questions.
It is asking better ones."

A few powerful discriminating questions outperform many weak ones.
Think before you ask. Ask with purpose. That is clinical intelligence.

One question — two pathways Stepwise narrowing Ask with purpose
Home